When Rule 4 is on your side

By Bob Rothman, making a living from racing since 1986

Most people meet Rule 4 as a deduction from their winnings. But the deduction is a fixed amount for a price, not a measure of what the withdrawal did to your horse's chance. When the chance goes up by more than the deduction takes away, Rule 4 is a help.

A worked example

Invented numbers to show the arithmetic. Not a forecast and not betting advice.

Three runners. Horses A and B are both evens. Horse C is 200/1 and is only there to make up the numbers. Before the off you have £1,000 on B at evens.

So after the deduction you are being paid 11/20 about a horse that wins nearly every time. That is worth about 1.53 times the fair return. In expected-return terms that is a gain of about 53% on the stake.

How big is that, in prices?

Punters think in prices, and a gain of about 53% in the odds sounds modest until it is put the way a price looks. Each row below has about the same gain: you are paid the price in the first column about a horse that is really worth the price in the second.

Everyday size

6/1 about a 7/2 shot

Decimal 7.0 against 4.5, a ratio of 1.56.

Headline size

25/1 about a 16/1 shot

Decimal 26.0 against 17.0, a ratio of 1.53.

PaidReally worthGain in expected return
2/1evens+50%
6/17/2+56%
16/110/1+55%
25/116/1+53%
33/121/1+55%

Big prices can mislead the other way too: 20/1 down to 10/1 looks like a similar move to 2/1 down to evens, but it is a much bigger change (decimal 21 against 11, a ratio of 1.9, against 3 against 2, a ratio of 1.5). Compare the decimal prices, not the fractions.

Why it is not a sure thing

Try your own numbers

The calculator works out the break-even: how likely a withdrawal has to be for your bet to pay on average. The chances are your own estimates. The pre-filled figures are the example above with a price 10% worse than fair.

The short version